Well, it could be. Depending on the case. In the following, for example, the Spanish Supreme Court considers there is illegitimate intrusion into privacy in a case in which a lord installed surveillance cameras, unfit to record, and being oriented to the accesses and estate of the neighbouring claimant. These were mere...
The answer is that neither option alone is superior to the other in compliance. The law perfectly allows both options and since both this law and the Spanish Data Protection Agency tell us that the hiring of an external video surveillance service or the installation...
The answer is, it DEPENDS. • First of all, all administrative permissions must exist for installation. • Secondly, in order to be able to take captures of video-captured images it must be demonstrated that there is a legitimate basis or reason for such processing (public interest...